Mukul rohatgi and maharastra solicitor general in favour of devendra fadnavis and ajit pawar in supreme court gave these arguments.
Image credit to thewire.in |
Mukul rohatgi and maharastra solicitor general
House court, court honors the house
What are arguments of mukul rohatgi in supreme court
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared before the court on behalf of the Maharashtra BJP Independent MLAs. He said that the House respected the court and the court respected the House. The same is true, otherwise the Assembly can pass such a bill tomorrow that the top court will settle all the cases in two years. He said that the Supreme Court held that there were no two opinions that the power test was the best way to prove a majority.The political party does not have the right to appeal
Rohatgi said, 'I have appeared on behalf of some BJP MLAs. It is the prerogative of the Governor. Its hearing should first be held in the High Court. There was no need for a hearing on Sunday. No political party has the right to appeal. All the appellant parties are here. This has not happened in any case before. A majority test can be held tomorrow after the oath of the Protem Speaker, the oath of the MLAs and then the Governor's brief speech.
What happened under what process
Mukul rohatgi further said, 'Two-three days time can be given. Everyone should put their affidavits in front of the court. The governor has the right to choose someone as the chief minister. Now there will be a majority test. ' On this, Justice Ramanna said that the rules are fixed for every process. To which Rohatgi said that the question arises as to what the court can do and can do. On this, Justice Bhushan said that we do not even know whether and under what process?